Verificar estado da encomenda

Faça parte de uma comunidade de amantes de livros de todo o mundo e tenha acesso a uma série de benefícios. Crie uma conta gratuitamente

Correio DHL 7.99 € Correio DPD 4.49 € Correio MRW 3.99 € Ponto DPD 3.99 €

Contacto

Como comprar

Ajuda

A minha conta

▸ Vazio :-(

Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis

Name: Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
SKU: 18715689
Price: 22.88 EUR
Availability: InStock
Author: Olga Yashkir
ISBN: 9786202093750

Olga Yashkir

Yuri Yashkir

Língua

Inglês

Livro Capa mole

Código Libristo: 18715689

Editoras LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, novembro 2016

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tob... Descrição completa

Código Libristo: 18715689

55 b

22.88 €

Armazenamento externo Envio em 5-8 dias

Política de devolução de 30 dias

Os clientes também compraram

Charite sacerdotale, ou Lecons elementaires de theologie pastorale. Tome 2 DESURMONT-A

Capa mole

30.27 €

Les droits sexuels ou la destruction programmée de l’enfance et de la famille Sigaut

Capa mole

21.87 €

Die Sünde aber gebiert den Tod Andrea Schacht

Capa mole

8.09 €

Carte des Vignobles et Vins de France - Affiche 50x70cm

binding.

25.61 €

leben // gestalten Ulf Kilian

Livro de capa dura

19.23 €

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tobit, Beta Regression, Inflated Beta Regression, Censored Gamma Regression) in order to compare their performance. We show that for a given input data set, the quality of the model calibration depends mainly on the proper choice of explanatory variables, but not on the fitting model. Model factors were chosen based on their correlation with historical LGDs of the calibration data set. Numerical values of non-quantitative parameters (industry, ranking, type of collateral) were introduced as their LGD average. We show that different debt instruments depend on different sets of model factors (from three factors for Revolving Credit or for Subordinated Bonds to eight factors for Senior Secured Bonds). Calibration of LGD models using distressed business cycle periods provide better fit than data from total available time span. Calibration algorithms and details of their realization using the R statistical package are presented. We demonstrate how LGD models can be used for stress testing. The results of this study can be of use to risk managers concerned with the Basel accord compliance.