Não gostou? Não há problema! Pode devolver no prazo de 30 dias
Não há como errar com um vale de oferta. O presenteado pode escolher qualquer produto da nossa oferta.
Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and LaRue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Olá! Sou o Libroamiko, o seu conselheiro de livros.
Como posso ajudar?