Balance between poets

People were broken on the love of the comparison between the means that aim to one purpose, and the balance between the species that dates back to one origin, and this instinct appeared clearly when the poetry appeared, and the poets loan were coated. The balance is only a form of criticism, which is characterized by the bad from the good, and the faces of strength and weakness appear in the methods of the statement: it requires strength in literature, and with insight into the Arab aspects of the expression, and from here the ancients were to judge the genius under its red dome, in the Okaz market, In their view, he was the most able of poets on the weight of speech. The writers in various ages assigned the budget between those who want poets in one era: they balanced between the person of Al -Qais, Al -Nabeghi, Zuhair, Al -Ashi in the pre -Islamic era, and between Jarir, Al -Farazdaq, and Al -Akhtal in the Umayyad state, and between Abu Nawas, Muslim bin Al -Walid, Abu Al -Atahia, Between Ibn Al -Mu''taz and Ibn Al -Roumi, and between Abu Tammam and Al -Bahtari in the Abbasid state, as well as the budgets between those who wanted after those stallions to the era in which we live, and the covenant is close to what was written in the budget between Shawky, Hafiz and Matran in the Egyptian and Syrian newspapers, and writers are still different in their rule On those who presented them, or their contemporary poets. This book shows here the mistakes of the critics who confronted in the past or modern to the budget between two poets: they combined one era, or they participated in the statement for one purpose, and that the balance between poets we put a balance that depends on it in the weight of the poets of good deeds and bad deeds.